Alliant International University
WSCUC Reaffirmation 2019-20
WSCUC Standard 2
Meeting WSCUC Standards
Standard 2 and the Criteria for Review (CFRs) are below. Examples of evidence for achievement of this WSCUC Standard and CFRs are listed and linked below.
Standard 2: Achieving Educational Objectives through Core Functions
The institution achieves its purposes and attains its educational objectives at the institutional and program level through the core functions of teaching and learning, scholarship and creative activity, and support for student learning and success. The institution demonstrates that these core functions are performed effectively by evaluating valid and reliable evidence of learning and by supporting the success of every student.
Teaching and Learning
Criteria for Review (CFR)
2.1 The institution’s educational programs are appropriate in content, standards of performance, rigor, and nomenclature for the degree level awarded, regardless of mode of delivery. They are staffed by sufficient numbers of faculty qualified for the type and level of curriculum offered.
Guidelines: The content, length, and standards of the institution’s academic programs conform to recognized disciplinary or professional standards and are subject to peer review.
-Many of Alliant's programs are accredited by recognized specialty accreditors demonstrating conformance with professional standards for content and faculty qualifications
-Faculty positions establish rigorous requirements; faculty-to-student ratios are calculated twice per year in each program area to monitor faculty sufficiency
2.2 All degrees awarded by the institution are clearly defined in terms of entry-level requirements and levels of student achievement necessary for graduation that represent more than simply an accumulation of courses or credits. The institution has both a coherent philosophy, expressive of its mission, which guides the meaning of its degrees and processes that ensure the quality and integrity of its degrees.
-Alliant's programs are professional practice programs that align with the instiuttional A-IMPACT Competencies; program outcomes are aligned with institutional and disciplinary standards
-Program faculty define required levels of achievement for graduation for assignments, courses, grades, exams, and capstones
2.2a Undergraduate programs engage students in an integrated course of study of sufficient breadth and depth to prepare them for work, citizenship, and life-long learning. These programs ensure the development of core competencies including, but not limited to, written and oral communication, quantitative reasoning, information literacy, and critical thinking. In addition, undergraduate programs actively foster creativity, innovation, an appreciation for diversity, ethical and civic responsibility, civic engagement, and the ability to work with others. Undergraduate programs also ensure breadth for all students in cultural and aesthetic, social and political, and scientific and technical knowledge expected of educated persons. Undergraduate degrees include significant in-depth study in a given area of knowledge (typically described in terms of a program or major). Guidelines: The institution has a program of General Education that is integrated throughout the curriculum, including at the upper division level, together with significant in-depth study in a given area of knowledge (typically described in terms of a program or major).
-A general education program is articulated with undergraduate majors
-Each undergraduate major/degree program establishes outcomes related to core competencies, diversity, and ethical action, examples BS in Business Administration, BS in Psychology, BS in Information Systems and Technology
2.2b The institution’s graduate programs establish clearly stated objectives differentiated from and more advanced than undergraduate programs in terms of admissions, curricula, standards of performance, and student learning outcomes. Graduate programs foster students’ active engagement with the literature of the field and create a culture that promotes the importance of scholarship and/or professional practice. Ordinarily, a baccalaureate degree is required for admission to a graduate program.
-Graduate programs require more complex work such as dissertations, comprehensive exams, state- and nationally-normed exams, and many prepare students for licensure or credentialing 2.3 The institution’s student learning outcomes and standards of performance are clearly stated at the course, program, and, as appropriate, institutional level. These outcomes and standards are reflected in academic programs, policies, and curricula, and are aligned with advisement, library, and information and technology resources, and the wider learning environment. Guidelines: The institution is responsible for ensuring that out-of-class learning experiences, such as clinical work, service learning, and internships which receive credit, are adequately resourced, well developed, and subject to appropriate oversight.
-All programs have student learning outcomes with performance standards established by faculty
-Programs requiring clinical field training have clinical training/clinical practice departments (examples-CSPP or CSOE) or faculty who support and oversee field training as documented in organization charts 2.4 The institution’s student learning outcomes and standards of performance are developed by faculty and widely shared among faculty, students, staff, and (where appropriate) external stakeholders. The institution’s faculty take collective responsibility for establishing appropriate standards of performance and demonstrating through assessment the achievement of these standards. Guidelines: Student learning outcomes are reflected in course syllabi.
-Program and course learning outcomes are included in course syllabi
-Program faculty develop assessment plans, including acceptable performance standards, which are documented in the Taskstream Assessment Management system
2.5 The institution’s academic programs actively involve students in learning, take into account students’ prior knowledge of the subject matter, challenge students to meet high standards of performance, offer opportunities for them to practice, generalize, and apply what they have learned, and provide them with appropriate and ongoing feedback about their performance and how it can be improved.
-Students report on course evaluations that the courses are appropriately challenging (ratings were 4.40 ouf of 5 on the course evaluations for 2018-19 (universitywide data)
-Alliant's programs focus on application of theory and incorporate applied assignments such as case studies, application of knowledge in field training experiences, preparing them for professional practice
-Many programs provide students with extensive written feedback on their progress in the program annually 2.6 The institution demonstrates that its graduates consistently achieve its stated learning outcomes and established standards of performance. The institution ensures that its expectations for student learning are embedded in the standards that faculty use to evaluate student work.
Guidelines: The institution has an assessment infrastructure adequate to assess student learning at program and institution levels.
-Programs have generally high graduation rates -Many programs use rubrics to score assignments and dissertations, and field training (practicum and internship, or clinical practice) evaluations -Programs directors and faculty work with program, assessment, and institutional research staff to collect and aggregate data; resources and processes are documented on the Assessment site 2.7 All programs offered by the institution are subject to systematic program review. The program review process includes, but is not limited to, analyses of student achievement of the program’s learning outcomes; retention and graduation rates; and, where appropriate, results of licensing examination and placement, and evidence from external constituencies such as employers and professional organizations.
-Either specialty accreditation or an intensive program review process fulfills the university's program review policy
Scholarship and Creative Activity
Criteria for Review (CFR)
2.8 The institution clearly defines expectations for research, scholarship, and creative activity for its students and all categories of faculty. The institution actively values and promotes scholarship, creative activity, and curricular and instructional innovation, and their dissemination appropriate to the institution’s purposes and character.
-Faculty Workload Agreement 2.9 The institution recognizes and promotes appropriate linkages among scholarship, teaching, assessment, student learning, and service.
Student Success and Student Learning
Criteria for Review (CFR)
2.10 The institution demonstrates that students make timely progress toward the completion of their degrees and that an acceptable proportion of students complete their degrees in a timely fashion, given the institution’s mission, the nature of the students it serves, and the kinds of programs it offers. The institution collects and analyzes student data, disaggregated by appropriate demographic categories and areas of study. It tracks achievement, satisfaction, and the extent to which the campus climate supports student success. The institution regularly identifies the characteristics of its students; assesses their preparation, needs, and experiences; and uses these data to improve student achievement. Guidelines: The institution disaggregates data according to racial, ethnic, gender, age, economic status, disability, and other categories, as appropriate. The institution benchmarks its retention and graduation rates against its own aspirations as well as the rates of peer institutions.
-CSPP Program Dashboards
2.11 Consistent with its purposes, the institution offers co-curricular programs that are aligned with its academic goals, integrated with academic programs, and designed to support all students’ personal and professional development. The institution assesses the effectiveness of its co-curricular programs and uses the results for improvement. -Co-curricular events - prior year events and current event calendar
2.12 The institution ensures that all students understand the requirements of their academic programs and receive timely, useful, and complete information and advising about relevant academic requirements. Guidelines: Recruiting materials and advertising truthfully portray the institution. Students have ready access to accurate, current, and complete information about admissions, degree requirements, course offerings, and educational costs.
-Master plans of study
-Program Handbooks developed by faculty and academic administrators
2.13 The institution provides academic and other student support services such as tutoring, services for students with disabilities, financial aid counseling, career counseling and placement, residential life, athletics, and other services and programs as appropriate, which meet the needs of the specific types of students that the institution serves and the programs it offers.
-Student affairs and engagement organization of services in student advising, student services, and academic support departments
2.14 Institutions that serve transfer students provide clear, accurate, and timely information, ensure equitable treatment under academic policies, provide such students access to student services, and ensure that they are not unduly disadvantaged by the transfer process. Guidelines: Formal policies or articulation agreements are developed with feeder institutions that minimize the loss of credits through transfer credits.
-Institutional local and international partnership agreements developed with the Partnership Development Office
The Alliant WSCUC Reaffirmation Steering Committee invites you to participate in our institutional preparation for the WSCUC process:
© 2020 Alliant International University